1 comments

  • glum64 53 minutes ago
    Well, that "How we identify UK sites" should be "How we define a UK site".

    I have a server hosted in UK by a US company, being a resident and a citizen of neither...

    • jMyles 4 minutes ago
      What you've identified is the looming great conflict of the coming decades. Legacy states presume that the internet regards reality on their terms.

      If states want to legislate internet objects, they first need to very clearly explain how they define the objects which they regard as being within their purview.

    • zarzavat 7 minutes ago
      What's the difference? If the UK wants to archive your website it can do so, it's public.
      • jMyles 3 minutes ago
        Of course that's true.

        But it's still bizarre for a legacy entity like a nation state to presume that it can identify an internet phenomenon without first explaining what it even means when declaring its intention to do so.

    • crtasm 39 minutes ago
      There's three other signifiers listed besides being hosted in the UK - do any of those apply to your site?
      • glum64 31 minutes ago
        I think that to identify something one should define it first. That article fails to make a difference.