This is literally AI, in every case. AI is literally the exploitation of the commons, both in the theft of intellectual property for training, and in how it is used.
> I don't get it, so far as I can tell you still need to manually choose whether to RSVP? It's not like it's going to RSVP to all events for you.
The title itself does say "automatically apply to events".
I'm guessing this came about because many organisers have some sort of pre-acceptance filter these days, to minimise the attendee signal-to-noise ratio (which, stupidly, often relies on job titles).
I missed out on an event recently because it was full. I got a notification that a spot had become available shortly before it started, but I had an hour travel to get there so wasn't viable.
I think tools to enable better discovery are a good thing, but I'm not sure that I like the idea of splatting RSVPs just in case.
>Help me find events that match my goals. Apply to eligible free events and keep a spreadsheet so I can review them and decide which to attend later.
I am not event attender. But doesn't this whole process sound like it is entirely wrong way around... Shouldn't review always come before applying? Doing the process that way just sounds like extremely selfish...
I'm not sure whether the people developing these spam tools simply lack the imagination or empathy to see the world through the eyes of other people or can but don't care. Or maybe the "grindset" / "maxxing" mentality demands callousness by its very nature.
Sigh. As someone in the business of creating and hosting conferences please consider not doing this. It's such a giant drain on resources for event organizers to get applications and RSVPs for people that don't actually want to attend, and it could really harm well meaning people to plan for larger events by booking bigger rooms or arranging for food and logistics and so on.
If you decide to take this approach understand and likely to spawn countermeasures or consequences. The most likely outcome of this isn't better for anyone, it's just a world that has more application fees and roadblocks put in front of people who aren't assholes.
If one person does this, no big deal.
If everyone starts doing this, you're basically just creating spam. It'll become like LinkedIn job applications.
For example, it makes coding available to a much wider audience and increases the amount of useful software that can be built.
Training on data makes the information in that data widely available to general public, which is beneficial.
The title itself does say "automatically apply to events".
I'm guessing this came about because many organisers have some sort of pre-acceptance filter these days, to minimise the attendee signal-to-noise ratio (which, stupidly, often relies on job titles).
The video embedded in README.md shows ChatGPT instrumenting Chrome to click the RSVP button on Partiful events and fill out the RSVP forms in bulk.
This is a spam tool.
I think tools to enable better discovery are a good thing, but I'm not sure that I like the idea of splatting RSVPs just in case.
I am not event attender. But doesn't this whole process sound like it is entirely wrong way around... Shouldn't review always come before applying? Doing the process that way just sounds like extremely selfish...
I'm a little worried that the complexity could be too much and dissatisfying if I have to spend a ton of time tweaking it.
https://world.hey.com/jason/5300-in-100s-3be4c194
https://world.hey.com/jason/5300-in-100s-the-verdict-74c4108...
Even a token fee like $5 would probably dramatically cut frivolous RSVP and noshow rates.
(I am sorta building something around this idea… lots of yak-shaving happening though.)
If you decide to take this approach understand and likely to spawn countermeasures or consequences. The most likely outcome of this isn't better for anyone, it's just a world that has more application fees and roadblocks put in front of people who aren't assholes.