The top secret URSALA, RAQUEL, and FARRAH satellites

(thespacereview.com)

75 points | by Bluestein 1 hour ago

4 comments

  • Almondsetat 30 minutes ago
    The incredible and futuristic technologies the US managed to deploy decades before the competition reminds me of the story of how the NRO gifted NASA a couple of their old decommissioned satellites in 2012 and they turned out to be basically upgraded Hubble telescopes pointed at earth. The US from the 90s to the 2000s had multiple Hubble-level telescopes just for spying while NASA was fighting for scraps to study the entire cosmos.
    • ironqcold 24 minutes ago
      I didn't know about this, that's interesting
    • toomuchtodo 20 minutes ago
      One of the NRO optical imaging system gifts (from the canceled NRO Future Imagery Architecture reconnaissance satellite program) is in the recently launched Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.

      https://science.nasa.gov/mission/roman-space-telescope/

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace_Roman_Space_Telesc...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_National_Reconnaissance_O...

      (Contact the film vibes, “why build one when you can build two?”)

    • corvad 22 minutes ago
      I mean NASA's budget was/is minuscule in comparison to defense spending so I am not surprised.
      • deepsun 13 minutes ago
        How? NASA budget is around 20-30bn in recent years, same scale as US Space Force department budget (26bn in recent years, 40bn in 2026). Comparable, but not minuscule.
        • whatever1 7 minutes ago
          Why is the space force budget relevant? The US has had spy satellites decades before the clown made the space force for his family and friends to feast.
          • dmix 4 minutes ago
            [dead]
    • shevy-java 24 minutes ago
      I am not entirely convinced. Was not Hubble damaged and got an upgrade lateron? I mean it could be possible that NASA is starved, but the repair involved other countries too, and I don't think the USA could keep mega-super-duper technology hidden from others in the long run. And NASA often wants more money - just take the whole search for life on planets. This is so pointless - life exists already here. What is the addiction to want to find life outside of the planet? Other than, of course, getting more money, which is understandable, but it doesn't answer the question. (Not that I am against better technology; the rationale just does not convince me at all here.)
      • addaon 19 minutes ago
        Hubble wasn’t damaged, the mirror was mis-shaped (by design) to be near-sighted, needing a corrective lens.

        But if you were looking at nearer objects…

        • r58lf 6 minutes ago
          probably what you mean, but to be clear there was an error in manufacturing the mirror. There was a calibration piece that was slightly larger then the design called for.
  • dbdoug 4 minutes ago
    I’m not going to be alive in 40 years, but I would like to have known what classified information will be released in 2066 dealing with satellites in orbit now?
  • Jtsummers 55 minutes ago
    Related submission: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49914880 - "A Cold War Spy Satellite Named After Farrah Fawcett Just Blew Apart in Orbit"
  • shevy-java 25 minutes ago
    I am more concerned about Facebook's Spyglasses. That one is quite pertinent.