MiMo-v2.6-Pro: Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

 (artificialanalysis.ai)

27 points | by theanonymousone 3 hours ago

4 comments

  • dom96 16 minutes ago
    It is an impressive model. Agreed on most that is written on this page, with the exception of it being fast. I ran it on my own LLM benchmark suite[1] and it is faster than DeepSeek but still much slower than leading models. But it's pricing is where it really shines.

    KillSwitch-Bench 1.0

      Claude Opus 5           66.9
  GPT-6 Astra             57.9
  Claude Fable 5.1        46.7
  MiMo-V2.6-Pro           38.8
  Muse Spark 1.3          36.5
    1 - https://bench.killswitch-lang.org/
  • egeres 17 minutes ago
    It feels suspicious that MiMo-V2.6 Pro gets 46 in de index while DeepSeek-V4.1 (https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-1-flash) gets 39. According to the appendix at the bottom of https://mimo.xiaomi.com/mimo-v2-6 the deepseek model sometimes surpasses mimo and it's not so far behind in capabilities. A week ago opus 5 appeared 1 points ahead of fable 5 despite fable being a much smarter model
  • kosolam 4 minutes ago
    Why sol is not in the comparison?
  • jampekka 1 hour ago
    "When evaluating the Intelligence Index, it generated 140M tokens, which is somewhat verbose in comparison to the median of 140M."
    [-]