How to compromise your system with a job interview

(codedge.de)

41 points | by codedge 1 hour ago

9 comments

  • dprkh 26 minutes ago
    There is a YC company that makes a coding interview tool. They want you to run their CLI on your machine and trust that it won't do anything malicious, when in fact it installs a bunch of things onto your machine without consent, scans processes, and intercepts requests from AI tools. It's crazy that people think this is acceptable.
    • MajorTakeaway 10 minutes ago
      Even more reason to use VMs.
      • tamimio 4 minutes ago
        They (not what OP is talking about but usually these software) detect if a VM exists and abort, to prevent “cheating”.
    • stronglikedan 13 minutes ago
      Just that fact that the company expects a candidate to even have their own machine is egregious.
    • delichon 19 minutes ago
      Maybe it's a pen test such that if the CLI can phone home you fail, to weed out candidates with weak security fu.
  • pronoiac 4 minutes ago
    If you run across something like this:

    * perhaps archive your findings

    * report the abuse to their hosting

    I'm dropping emails to jsonbin.io and to ZapHosting (who run 147.189.174.138) about this.

  • sixtyj 16 minutes ago
    It reads like a true crime story.

    Bad actor had prepared the set up so precisely that Claude Code could not detect it.

    Malware Bytes? Acronis? There must be some template…

  • john_strinlai 1 hour ago
    out of the list under "Before you start with the test, you might be suspicious about the following:" there is only one that is important:

    only interact with people using an official email address.

    the rest can be used as yellow/red flags, but simply asking for confirmation via an official email address will thwart the vast majority of scams (including other ones, like someone claiming to be from Intuit calling about your QuickBooks or whatever).

  • aliasxneo 1 hour ago
    I get enough legit and illegitimate ones every week on LinkedIn that it's become really easy to tell the difference. Hard to pinpoint in a comment because it's mostly a gut feeling. But, in rough order:

    1. Look at the person's LinkedIn profile contacting you and examine their post history. In one comical scenario the "recruiter" had a long 4 year gap where they were writing comments in English and all of the sudden they switched to Spanish. Mostly short, pointless comments as well.

    2. Look at the company and make sure they have a legitimate website and are still actually in business. Even better, see if there's a public team page that lists this person.

    3. Give the recruiter an email (I usually use something like SimpleLogin) and ask them to forward you the details. Of course, pay close attention to what address they send it from.

    4. In addition, or alternatively, ask the recruiter for the public job listing (scammers almost always "paste" it into a DM or upload a clearly AI generated PDF doc).

    Once you learn the game it's not too hard to start picking up on them. I've made it a game to play along sometimes just for fun. Ultimately, at the end of the day, make sure you report them on LinkedIn. I've had the account disappear within a hour of doing so.

    • stevekemp 59 minutes ago
      Honestly unless I'm planning on quitting my current job, or if I were unemployed, I just ignore the linkedin.

      Sure they spam you with "XX wants to connect", or "I'm awaiting your reply" emails. But real contacts and friends can call/email you, and everybody else can wait six months.

      Despite only connecting with actual people I've worked with, not recruiters, I still get "suggested" posts which are slop, and "that happened". The site is a cesspool.

  • sandeepkd 1 hour ago
    These seem like a common pattern lately. I feel for it but again people are creative in making business out of others desperation.
  • esafak 1 hour ago
    I remember reading a similar article here not long ago, and the attack relied on auto-loading in VSCode.

    https://opensourcemalware.com/blog/latest-contagious-intervi...

  • NalNezumi 33 minutes ago
    .... Why would you do job interview when they expect you to run some code on your own system, on your own time?

    Maybe I work in a different field but last year when I was still looking for jobs, only one company asked for coding assignment and every other company did coding interview which is always browser based editor.

    I feel like the industry is mature enough that you can tell a company that sends you a zip file of code to f-off.

    • msdz 32 minutes ago
      > .... Why would you do job interview when they expect you to run some code on your own system, on your own time?

      Because both the company and you know it’s the most effective job interview “filter” in SWE roles.

      > on your own time

      It may not be unpaid if you’re applying to a decent company.

      The issue here is their poor implementation (zip file), not the concept itself, IMO.

  • zuzululu 1 hour ago
    wonder if codex can catch issues ?

    > A note on the AI part: Claude Code was not able to detect any strange things when just prompted to scan the code base for unusual patterns.