3 comments

  • bcraven 1 minute ago
    “It still gets people surprised,” Milstein says. “Everybody asks, what about the head? But we’re actually able to reduce the effective dose by 60 percent without protecting the head, the arms, or even the legs.”

    Whilst I understand the maths here, I can see why someone would be nervous!

  • TheDudeMan 59 minutes ago
    Why wouldn't it?
    • rtkwe 49 minutes ago
      The difficulty is making it protective but light enough to not significantly hinder the spacecraft or person wearing it, all of which is covered in the article.
    • solarengineer 49 minutes ago
      Poor design, flawed assumptions, manufacturing defects, inability to bear the gravitational and rocket launch forces, inability of the jacket to last the duration of the radiation exposure - these are some reasons that come to my mind on why a radiation-blocking vest wouldn't have worked for the journey to the moon and back (i.e. your question "Why wouldn't it?".)
  • alehlopeh 34 minutes ago
    The use of “we” in this headline is really jarring.
    • ButlerianJihad 8 minutes ago
      We Flew to the Moon and Back So You Wouldn't Have To!