Verizon is About to Break our Watches

(jefftk.com)

62 points | by jefftk 2 hours ago

9 comments

  • teliskr 8 minutes ago
    I have a verizon watch only account. I was able to get the new app working, but it was a struggle. I think it worked on the 3rd or 4th attempt. I had to start over and lost all of the contacts that were connected to the watch. Fortunately, there were only a few.

    Overall, the Gizmo watch has been nice to have, but it leaves a lot to be desired. It's surprising that there are not better products in this market segment.

  • bombcar 1 hour ago
    Cell phone enabled watches are a pile of hacks sitting on top of hacks on top of a system pretending to be a telephone switch board from the 1940s. It’s surprising any of it works.
    • derefr 1 hour ago
      In what way are watches with SIMs (or eSIMs) not just tiny cell phones? Or is you meaning that the modern smartphone is itself a “pile of hacks sitting on top of hacks”?
      • sulam 23 minutes ago
        The main way is that literally zero of these watches actually meet the standards that the cell networks require of a cell phone. Every single one of them has a carrier exemption or a lower standard to adhere to, because it turns out that putting a cell phone's RF package into a watch is super hard, both because of size and the various negative effects of the human body on radio signals. This affects cell phones too of course, but less so (remember the iPhone 4 and how we were "holding it wrong"?).

        Another way is that watch chipsets are distinct from cell phone chipsets in that they make a variety of compromises unique to wearable requirements. Apple may be an exception here, you can't get a spec sheet for their chip, but for the other providers their wearable chipsets are generations behind anything they sell for a cell phone and are compromised in terms of power. Interestingly even watches (Apple, Samsung soon) that support 5G are running a dumbed down version of 5G that was created specifically to support the wearables and IoT market.

        It gets even stranger in software. A text showing up on your watch might have arrived two completely different ways depending on whether it's an iMessage or a regular text and you can't tell which. The watch often doesn't even have its own number -- it's borrowing your phone's. IOW, it's not a tiny phone doing phone things, it's a companion device trying to fake it.

    • acdha 1 hour ago
      I just went through this yesterday. My wife and I both have Apple Watches with LTE and I was rolling them over: both phones and my watch ported easily but the second watch wouldn’t show up on the account at all with no explanation. The first support person couldn’t see a problem with the details they were able to see, the second level one could see a fraud hold for non-specific reasons and forwarded us to a fraud team who verified my identity and back to a third person who solved the problem by deleting and recreating the line on our account. Every one of the people I talked to was clearly trying to help but their billing system sounds like it’s someone’s old house primarily consisting of duct tape and stucco.

      This is a disappointing contrast to their actual network which is clearly run by people who take running a reliable network seriously with good coverage and latency.

  • motbus3 30 minutes ago
    Since beginning of 2025 big corps turned to be each time more anti consumer. They feel quite comfortable. I wonder what happened for them to feel like that.
    • bigC5560 5 minutes ago
      Sounds to me like you just became aware of it in 2025. This has been happening for forever. Keeping with the electronics example, the Phoebus cartel was lowering the lifespan of lightbulbs in the 1920s. The US government seemed to be stricter on it at that time (I mean in the 1920s), but billions of dollars in lobbying will change that over time.
    • mr_toad 7 minutes ago
      Pretty sure that phone companies have been anti-customer ever since the invention of the telephone.
    • diego_moita 0 minutes ago
      > Since beginning of 2025

      I suggest you to study the birth of consumer protection laws on the beginning of the 20th century, such as the birth of the FTC in 1914. It was a time when milk and beer were routinely adulterated, most meat was contaminated and all sorts of cartels did price fixing.

    • replygirl 8 minutes ago
      just since 2025?
    • nxm 16 minutes ago
      Any actual evidence to backup this claim?
      • kmbfjr 9 minutes ago
        Are you serious?

        Only in the last week we have Sony deleting paid-for movies. That is pretty anti-consumer.

        I realize all of this is empirical, but the term enshitification just didn’t form out of thin air.

        • cj 2 minutes ago
          He's probably looking for evidence of "Since beginning of 2025". (I'm curious too)

          Feels like we've been on the same train for over a decade.

  • mgiampapa 11 minutes ago
    I feel like this is an edge case where it's less expensive for Verizon to issue a refund than it is to actually fix the problem. Sometimes paying for the problem to go away is the best solution and you get a new thing that works better.
  • bee_rider 1 hour ago
    I wonder what the warranty period on this sort of device is. It’s broken without access to the hub, right? And it’s only 2 years old.
  • Hizonner 27 minutes ago
    Hey, that scorpion stung me!
    • Underphil 16 minutes ago
      Honestly, I'm beginning to feel the same at this point. How many stories of people getting burned do we need before we collectively wake up?
  • slipperybeluga 1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • fragmede 1 hour ago
    Choosing a carrier device without being on that carrier for the rest of your devices would seem to be the first mistake. Treating the carrier as anything other than dumb pipe seems like the issue here. Going with the Pixel Watch LTE and then doing same custom app development might make more sense for the described use case, but I haven't explored the author's use case thoroughly.
    • ghostly_s 44 minutes ago
      Good point, consumers should all simply develop their own apps instead of buying a product.
    • anonymars 12 minutes ago
      So you blame the victim and also admit you haven't explored the author's use case. Very helpful
    • NetMageSCW 1 hour ago
      How would the custom app disable the native Watch services?
  • lowbloodsugar 1 hour ago
    Is part of US phone cartel. What you expect?