5 comments

  • jaffa2 1 hour ago
    > Where I had control, I made changes. Unnecessary labels removed. Accurate alt text added — not filed-in-for-compliance alt text, actually descriptive alt text. The heading structure was cleaned up where I could reach it. For this project's SharePoint tracking page, I rerouted entirely: instead of asking users to fight through the noise, the system now sends an email update at every stage of the approval.

    seems to be the only bit of text that actually details anything that was done. I would liked to have read about the actual changes and steps taken to improve accessibility instead of some kind of low key rant about MS

  • Planktonne 1 hour ago
    > revealed invisible

    Interesting that the language of sight is so prevalent that it appears in this very title twice.

    Echoing other comments, this would be a stronger article if it went into more specifics, but the AI voice precludes that meaningfully.

    • thaumasiotes 6 minutes ago
      > Interesting that the language of sight is so prevalent that it appears in this very title twice.

      Well, it appears once in "invisible", and once in "blind"... but I don't see why "blind" is a surprise when talking about someone blind.

      There is no reference to sight in "reveal".

  • Tepix 1 hour ago
    While the content was interesting, the AI-slop-stench was repelling.

    Talking about AI (sorry!), perhaps an AI assisted screen reader could remove repetitive elements (it appends "(read only)" to every. single. field.) in a smart fashion? Does this already exist?

    We're seeing AI being used to improve a11y in quite a few places: (Live) transcripts for video conferences, image to text (VQA, visual question answering) etc.

  • edu 1 hour ago
    > It took 18 hours of work.

    So a couple of days plus a few hours. Seems reasonable.