Blogger defeats photographer's copyright claim

(blog.ericgoldman.org)

22 points | by speckx 1 hour ago

2 comments

  • kmoser 52 minutes ago
    Lots to comment on but this stood out:

    > “A lawsuit like this heightens the demand for Generative AI replacements.”

    Most generative AI corpora were arguably trained on copyrighted material, making the output potentially infringing.

    • FanaHOVA 42 minutes ago
      There is plenty of precedent being written here. It does not seem to be the case at all for the average use of this technology.

      https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922

    • ralph84 3 minutes ago
      Except everyone who has tried to argue that in court has lost.
    • rectang 22 minutes ago
      Even if the specific image being infringed were not in the corpus, it's possible that a court would return a judgment of copyright infringement.

      Consider the case where someone deliberately prompts the AI to build a facsimile image and the AI does a creditable job after some tweaking.

  • tancop 54 minutes ago
    another day another reason why copyright should be for commercial use only (yes that means piracy will be legal). you can throw out entire categories of bad faith cases. art stealing companies still have to pay up and its easier to get what you deserve as an artist when the courts not filled with a backlog of useless low value claims.