Extraordinary Ordinals

(text.marvinborner.de)

18 points | by marvinborner 2 days ago

6 comments

  • tromp 24 minutes ago
    The author presents most known numeral systems (ways of representing natural numbers) in lambda calculus, classified by whether the term use their bound variables exactly one time (linear), at most one time (affine), or multiple times (non-linear). He illustrates some numerals in each system with a graphical notation that strongly reminds me of interaction nets [1], a computational model closely related to lambda calculus. The notation they use for lambda terms is rather non-standard. Compare

    > In β-reduction, k[(x⇒b)←a]⊳k[b{a/x}]k[(x⇒b)←a]⊳k[b{a/x}]

    with Wikipedia's [2]

    > The β-reduction rule states that a β-redex, an application of the form (λx. t) s, reduces to the term t[x:=s].

    The k[...] part means that β-reduction steps can happen in arbitrary contexts.

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction_nets

    [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_calculus

  • throwaway81523 18 minutes ago
    Hmm nice I guess, but I expected it was going to be about transfinite ordinals. I wonder if it can be extended to them.
  • p1esk 1 hour ago
    I didn’t understand that notation. Can someone please explain?
    • ngruhn 1 hour ago
      I think:

         x => a
      
      is:

         λx. a 
      
      and

         f <- a
      
      is just application. I.e.

         f a
      • lefra 43 minutes ago
        What about big T, square/angle brackets, and braces?
        • ngruhn 34 minutes ago
          yeah no idea
  • lefra 47 minutes ago
    I think I lack context to see what this is about. The line graphs are pretty though, and I'd like to understand more.
  • dnnddidiej 27 minutes ago
    This is beautiful art
  • bananaflag 1 hour ago
    This should be "numerals"