9 comments

  • zacharyozer 1 minute ago
    Congrats Steve! I haven't touched video since I was at JW Player a million years ago, but I always inspired by the simplicity of video.js (especially the theming).

    Hope this new iteration is exceptionally successful.

  • jjcm 4 minutes ago
    Out of curiousity, why not distribute this as a webcomponent? It's a perfect use case for it - a semantic object that has built in controls / chrome.
    • derefr 2 minutes ago
      Is it not a web component? Per the article, the embeddable HTML uses HTML Custom Elements (`<video-player>` + `<video-skin>`).
  • rcakebread 1 hour ago
    I just happened to try v10 yesterday for HLS and it's looking great so far.
  • michaelsalim 1 hour ago
    Looking great. I'll give it a try later on once things stabilize a bit. In the meantime, does anyone know what's going on in this space? Seems to me like a lot is changing over the past year. Eg: react-player new version, taken over by Mux. And also I did realize Video.js is sponsored by Mux. And also seemingly different companies working together.
    • Heff 38 minutes ago
      OP and Mux co-founder here so have all the context on this. A lot has changed. Mux stepped in to help maintain React Player a few years ago. It wasn't getting frequent updates and Mux has a vested interest in the whole OSS player ecosystem (even if we didn't built it) because Mux Video (hosting) is player agnostic, and we get support requests for all of them. @luwes from Mux did the work to get to the new version, while making it possible to use Media Chrome media elements with React Player and consolidating some development efforts. We're still a tiny player team so that was important.

      There are no immediate plans to deprecate React Player and I think it holds a special place in the ecosystem, but there will be overlap with video.js v10 and if there's specific features you care about or feel are missing, or if you think we're doing a bad job, please voice it here.

      It was a similar story with Vidstack and Plyr, with Mux first sponsoring the projects. That's how I met Rahim and Sam, and how we got talking about a shared vision for the future of players.

  • thedanbob 1 hour ago
    Very nice! I switched off video.js some time ago because it kept giving me trouble. Looking forward to trying this new version.
    • rahim_alwer 27 minutes ago
      Thank you! I’m on the Video.js team, and we’d love for you to try the library out and share your feedback. We’re especially eager to hear from developers who used or tried v8 in the past.

      We’re taking a new approach to the library with a lot of new concepts, so your feedback would help us a ton during Beta as we figure out what’s working well and what isn’t.

  • nakodari 2 hours ago
    Absolutely love what you and your friends have built. Great work! Will give it a spin.
    • rahim_alwer 26 minutes ago
      I'm on the Video.js team, just wanted to say thank you! Means a lot and we'd be eager to hear your experience trying it out. Feel free to drop a GitHub issue or discussion post if you ever get a chance :)
      • jen729w 16 minutes ago
        From me, this is a massive relief after we just deployed a bunch of videos to Vimeo. The next week they were bought.

        I'm a one-man operation. In the order of hundreds of videos served a week. All I want is control over my own destiny. If this and a VPS can do that, that'll be amazing. Thank you for doing this.

  • grzes 1 hour ago
    can anyone recommend me good, battle-tested "slider" solution for playing videos as well as displaying images from single gallery? ideally capable of handling huge galleries (hundreds of items) with lazy loading
  • sam_goody 1 hour ago
    Very nice. Good Luck!

    Did the private equity buy the domain videojs.org (did it take control of the project and you somehow regained control after selling) or was this domain (and the project) always under your control?

  • leontloveless 25 minutes ago
    [dead]