7 comments

  • tart-lemonade 6 minutes ago
    > These developments entail a future where travellers could enjoy reliable, high‑speed internet while flying, and where people on ships or in vehicles crossing remote regions can stay connected without interruption.

    How reliable/feasible would this be on the ground? From what I understand, shining non-trivial lasers in the sky is a massive liability because of the potential to interfere with aircraft. I don't see anything about the wavelength used, but even if it's outside the visible spectrum, it would still be subject to interference from aircraft when used on the ground or at sea.

  • Meneth 2 hours ago
    "low-latency links", says the article. I wonder if they consider 500 ms ping to be low, or if they want to replace Geostationary with Low Earth Orbit.
    • fidotron 2 hours ago
      Getting it to work with one end stationary first sounds like a reasonable development plan. LEO adds a lot of complexity, but with huge benefits.

      OTOH the number of engineers that focus on throughput over latency is quite staggering.

      • IrishTechie 1 hour ago
        I guess if your goal is just to stream aircraft telemetry and black box like recordings then latency may not be high on the agenda.
        • SiempreViernes 1 hour ago
          I think it's the opposite? For small telemetry you want it now, but for the big data products there's no hope of "now" and so you settle for soon.
        • connicpu 39 minutes ago
          Black box data doesn't need that crazy throughput either though. Traditional RF is much easier to get right, and works even when the aircraft starts losing track of where it is and stops being able to track the satellite with its laser
  • db48x 59 minutes ago
    Some miniaturization required.
  • utopiah 2 hours ago
  • cm2187 2 hours ago
    But that means you need to have a different laser pointed at every single individual aircraft right? Doesn’t really scale.
  • myrmidon 3 hours ago
    I'm really curious how the tracking works in such a system, and how "bad" the beam spread is (my impression is that from the diffraction limit alone the beam has to be spread over at least a ~10m radius after travelling 36000km).

    Some info on the laser itself would also be very interesting (power? wavelength?).

    Really cool project though!

    • amelius 2 hours ago
      > and how "bad" the beam spread is

      The spread makes the tracking easier, I suppose.

      • TimorousBestie 1 hour ago
        Perhaps a little, however. Different paths through the atmosphere will perturb the phase of the signal; depending on conditions not all of that ~10m beam width is going to decode with an acceptable bit error rate.
    • mytailorisrich 57 minutes ago
      Tracking and actuation is nothing new or particularly challenging, IMHO. It's the laser/optical part combined with throughput at that distance that is the main area of R&D, I think.
  • xnx 4 hours ago
    Impressive! I believe round trip latency would be 0.5 seconds.
    • 1e1a 3 hours ago
      That's ~162.5 MB in transit at any time
      • kevincox 2 hours ago
        Excellent for pingfs (https://github.com/yarrick/pingfs)
      • htgb 3 hours ago
        Shouldn't it be 1000/16 = 62.5? Impressive nonetheless, of course!
        • 1e1a 1 hour ago
          The article says 2.6 gigabits/second which is 2,600,000,000 bits/second, 2,600,000,000b/s * 0.5s / 8 is 162,500,000 bytes, 162,500,000 / 1,000,000 is 162.5 megabytes
      • zppln 3 hours ago
        Weird.