11 comments

  • Sophira 0 minutes ago
    I get that this is technically interesting, for certain, but the sheer amount of energy and associated global warming risk needed to do something with >=99% accuracy that we've been able to do easily for decades with a guaranteed 100% accuracy seems to me to be wasteful to the extreme.
  • alexlitz 7 minutes ago
    I made a blogpost on my submission (currently the top handwritten one at 36 parameters) https://alexlitzenberger.com/blog/building_a_minimal_transfo...
  • E-Reverance 1 hour ago
    Not sure how much this fits into the rules but I saw on twitter someone claimed 28 params : https://gist.github.com/SeuperHakkerJa/da3050739bea97aabd86e...
  • amelius 2 hours ago
    > In short: if you can swap in a different set of weights and use the exact same inference code for a different task, your setup is legitimate. If the inference code is inseparable from the algorithm, it's not.

    I wonder why they don't just write the code themselves, so by design the focus can be on the model.

  • i000 40 minutes ago
    Would it make sense to embed such single-purpose network with fixed weights within a LLM before pre-training?
  • medi8r 1 hour ago
    You can do that in a single matmul of course.
    • hyperhello 1 hour ago
      So can you take an arbitrary transformer and somehow turn it into a compact set of low-power fast gates by some algorithm?
      • measurablefunc 1 hour ago
        I think you're misunderstanding the joke.
        • medi8r 1 hour ago
          Yes joke is:

              [A B]
          
          times

              [1]
              [1]
          
          is

              [A+B]
          • hyperhello 54 minutes ago
            From context then, I infer that a transformer is not comprised of matrix multiplications, because it would simply be one that adds two 10-digit numbers.
            • medi8r 49 minutes ago
              A transformer tokenizes input, does a bunch of matmul and relu set up in a certain way. It doesn't get to see the raw number (just like you don't when you look at 1+1 you need visual cortex etc. first.)
  • ks2048 1 hour ago
    So, hand-coded weights can do it with 36 params and 311 for trained weights - did anyone try the former architecture, but starting with random weights and learning?
    • alexlitz 2 minutes ago
      For one the specific 36 parameter version is impossible without float64 so you might guess the corollary that it is not exactly amenable to being found by gradient descent. I think the question of how you can structure transformers and neural nets in general so that they can both very parsimoniously represent things like this and have it be amenible to learning by gradient descent.
  • munro 41 minutes ago
    >=99% accuracy wtf?!?

    I was initially excited until i saw that, because it would reveal some sort of required local min capacity, and then further revelation that this was all vibe coded and no arXiv, makes me feel I should save my attn for another article.

  • 1over137 47 minutes ago
    Now wrap it all in an Electron app!
  • jaunt7632 30 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • MarcLore 41 minutes ago
    [dead]